The development of aeronautical decision-making (ADM) training has significantly improved aviation safety by helping pilots recognize risks, reduce human error, and make safer operational decisions.
For decades, the importance of good pilot judgment, or aeronautical decision-making (ADM), has been recognized as critical to the safe operation of aircraft and accident prevention. The airline industry, motivated by the need to reduce accidents caused by human factors, developed the first training programs focused on improving ADM.
Crew resource management (CRM) training for flight crews is focused on the effective use of all available resources: human resources, hardware, and information to support ADM, facilitate crew cooperation, and improve decision-making. The goal of all flight crews is effective ADM, and CRM is one method used to support sound decision-making.
Research in this area prompted the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to produce training directed at improving the decision-making of pilots and led to current FAA regulations that require that decision-making be taught as part of the pilot training curriculum.
ADM research, development, and testing culminated in 1987 with the publication of six manuals oriented to the decision-making needs of variously rated pilots. These manuals provided multifaceted materials designed to reduce the number of decision-related accidents.
The effectiveness of these materials was validated through independent studies in which student pilots received this training in conjunction with the standard flying curriculum. When tested, the pilots who had received ADM training made fewer in-flight errors than those who had not received ADM training.
The results were statistically significant and showed approximately 10 to 50 percent fewer judgment errors. In the operational environment, an operator flying about 400,000 hours annually demonstrated a 54 percent reduction in accident rate after using these materials for recurrent training.
Contrary to popular opinion, good judgment can be taught. Tradition held that good judgment was a natural by-product of experience, but as pilots accumulated accident-free flight experience, a corresponding improvement in judgment was assumed.
Building on the foundation of conventional decision-making, ADM enhances the process by reducing the probability of human error and increasing the likelihood of a safe flight. ADM provides a structured, systematic approach to analyzing changes that occur during a flight and how these changes might affect the safe outcome of a flight. The ADM process addresses all aspects of decision-making in the flight deck and identifies the steps involved in good decision-making.
Steps for good decision-making are:
- Identifying personal attitudes hazardous to safe flight
- Learning behavior modification techniques
- Learning how to recognize and cope with stress
- Developing risk assessment skills
- Using available resources effectively
- Evaluating the effectiveness of one’s ADM skills
What drove the initial development of Aeronautical Decision-Making (ADM) training?
When did the FAA standardize ADM training materials for pilots?
How was the historical effectiveness of ADM training validated?
RELATED POSTS